Autosoft Journal

Online Manuscript Access


The challenge of the Paris Agreement to contain climate change


Authors



Abstract

Climate change due to anthropogenic CO 2 and other greenhouse gas emissions has had and will continue to have widespread negative impacts on human society and natural ecosystems. Drastic and concerted actions should be undertaken immediately if such impacts are to be prevented. The Paris Agreement on climate change aims to limit global mean temperature below 2 °C compared to the pre-industrial level. Using simulation and optimization tools and the most recent data, this paper investigates optimal emissions policies satisfying certain temperature constraints. The results show that only if we consider negative emissions coupled with drastic emissions reductions, temperature could be stabilized at about 2.5 °C, otherwise higher temperatures could possibly occur. To this end, two scenarios are developed based on the national emissions reduction plan of China and the USA. According to the simulation results, the objective of keeping temperature rise under 2 °C cannot be met. Clearly, negative emissions are needed if the Paris targets are to be given a chance for success. However, the feasibility of negative emissions mainly depends on technologies not yet developed. Reliance on future technological breakthroughs could very well prove unfounded and provide excuses for continued carbon releases with possible severe and irreversible climate repercussions. Thus, the Paris Agreement needs immediate amendments that will lead to stronger mitigation and adaptation commitments if it is to stay close to its goals.


Keywords


Pages

Total Pages: 12
Pages: 319-330

DOI
10.1080/10798587.2017.1292716


Manuscript ViewPdf Subscription required to access this document

Obtain access this manuscript in one of the following ways


Already subscribed?

Need information on obtaining a subscription? Personal and institutional subscriptions are available.

Already an author? Have access via email address?


Published

Volume: 24
Issue: 2
Year: 2018

References

Ackerman, F., & Bueno, R. (2011). Use of McKinsey abatement cost curvesfor climate economics modeling (Working Paper No. WP-US-1102).Stockholm Environment Institute. Retrieved from http://sei-us.org//Publications_PDF/SEI-WorkingPaperUS-1102.pdf

Ackerman, F., Stanton, E.A., & Bueno, R. (2012). CRED v. 1.4 technicalreport. Stockholm Environment Institute. Retrieved from http://sei-us.org/Publications_PDF/SEI-CRED-1.4-Technical-Report.pdf

Ackerman, Frank, Elizabeth A. Stanton, and Ramón Bueno. "CRED: A New Model of Climate and Development." Ecological Economics 85 (2013): 166-176. Crossref. Web. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.006

Anderson, K., and G. Peters. "The Trouble with Negative Emissions." Science 354.6309 (2016): 182-183. Crossref. Web. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah4567

Ashcroft, M. (2013). Negative emissions technologies: Climate necessity ortechnical distraction? Carbon Trust News. Retrieved from http://www.carbontrust.com/news/2013/06/negative-emissions-technologies-climate-necessity-or-technical-distraction

Benveniste, H., Criqui, P., Boucher, O., Breon, FM., Guivarch, C., Prados, Le Treut, H. (2015). The INDC counter, aggregation of nationalcontributions and 2 °C trajectories (Working Paper No. hal-01245354).HAL open archive. Retrieved from http://hal.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/hal-01245354/document

Boucher, Olivier et al. "Opinion: In the Wake of Paris Agreement, Scientists Must Embrace New Directions for Climate Change Research." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113.27 (2016): 7287-7290. Crossref. Web. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607739113

Dimitrov, Radoslav S. "The Paris Agreement on Climate Change: Behind Closed Doors." Global Environmental Politics 16.3 (2016): 1-11. Crossref. Web. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00361

Den Elzen, Michel et al. "Contribution of the G20 Economies to the Global Impact of the Paris Agreement Climate Proposals." Climatic Change 137.3-4 (2016): 655-665. Crossref. Web. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1700-7

Fawcett, A. A. et al. "Can Paris Pledges Avert Severe Climate Change?" Science 350.6265 (2015): 1168-1169. Crossref. Web. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5761

Fujimori, Shinichiro et al. "Implication of Paris Agreement in the Context of Long-Term Climate Mitigation Goals." SpringerPlus 5.1 (2016): n. pag. Crossref. Web. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3235-9

Grigoroudis, Evangelos et al. "Optimal Abatement Policies and Related Behavioral Aspects of Climate Change." Environmental Development 19 (2016): 10-22. Crossref. Web. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2016.04.002

Hof, A., van Soest, H., van den Berg, M., de Boer, H.S., den Elzen, M.,Harmsen, M., Roelfsema, M., & van Vuuren, D. (2015). Raising theambition level of INDCs allows for a smoother energy transition (ReportNo. 1928). PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.Retrieved from http://www.pbl.nl/sites/default/files/cms/publicaties/pbl-2015-raising-the-ambition-levels-of-indcs-allows-for-a-smoother-energy-transition_01928.pdf

Iyer, Gokul C et al. "The Contribution of Paris to Limit Global Warming to 2 °C." Environmental Research Letters 10.12 (2015): 125002. Crossref. Web. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125002

Jeffery, L., Fyson, C., Alexander, R., Gütschow, J., Rocha, M., & Cantzler,J., Blok, K. (2015). 2. 7 °C is not enough, we can get lower. ClimateAction Tracker. Retrieved from http://climateanalytics.org/files/cat_temp_update_cop21.pdf

Kennel, C. F., S. Briggs, and D. G. Victor. "Making Climate Science More Relevant." Science 354.6311 (2016): 421-422. Crossref. Web. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag3248

Meinshausen, Malte et al. "National Post-2020 Greenhouse Gas Targets and Diversity-Aware Leadership." Nature Climate Change 5.12 (2015): 1098-1106. Crossref. Web. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2826

Nordhaus, W.D., & Boyer, J. (2000). Warming the world: Economic modelsof global warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

Peters, Glen P et al. "Measuring a Fair and Ambitious Climate Agreement Using Cumulative Emissions." Environmental Research Letters 10.10 (2015): 105004. Crossref. Web. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/10/105004

Proto, Eugenio, and Aldo Rustichini. "A Reassessment of the Relationship Between GDP and Life Satisfaction." Ed. Mariano Sigman. PLoS ONE 8.11 (2013): e79358. Crossref. Web. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079358

Rogelj, Joeri et al. "Paris Agreement Climate Proposals Need a Boost to Keep Warming Well Below 2 °C." Nature 534.7609 (2016): 631-639. Crossref. Web. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18307

Schleussner, Carl-Friedrich et al. "Science and Policy Characteristics of the Paris Agreement Temperature Goal." Nature Climate Change 6.9 (2016): 827-835. Crossref. Web. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3096

Stanton, E.A., Cegan, J., Bueno, R., & Ackerman, F. (2012). Estimating regions”relative vulnerability to climate damages in the CRED model (WorkingPaper No. WP-US-1103, revised). Stockholm Environment Institute.Retrieved from https://www.sei-international.org/mediamanager/documents/Publications/Climate/SEI-WorkingPaperUS-1103-v2.pdf

Stavins, R.N. (2016). The Paris agreement lays a good foundation forclimate progress: An economic perspective. The Environmental Forum,33, 13. Retrieved from http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/stavins/files/column_72.pdf

Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817434

UNFCCC. (2016). Decisions adopted by the Conference of the Parties:Decision 1/CP. 21. United Nations, Framework Convention on ClimateChange. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/10a01.pdf

JOURNAL INFORMATION


ISSN PRINT: 1079-8587
ISSN ONLINE: 2326-005X
DOI PREFIX: 10.31209
10.1080/10798587 with T&F
IMPACT FACTOR: 0.652 (2017/2018)
Journal: 1995-Present




CONTACT INFORMATION


TSI Press
18015 Bullis Hill
San Antonio, TX 78258 USA
PH: 210 479 1022
FAX: 210 479 1048
EMAIL: tsiepress@gmail.com
WEB: http://www.wacong.org/tsi/