Autosoft Journal

Online Manuscript Access

The challenge of the Paris Agreement to contain climate change



Climate change due to anthropogenic CO 2 and other greenhouse gas emissions has had and will continue to have widespread negative impacts on human society and natural ecosystems. Drastic and concerted actions should be undertaken immediately if such impacts are to be prevented. The Paris Agreement on climate change aims to limit global mean temperature below 2 °C compared to the pre-industrial level. Using simulation and optimization tools and the most recent data, this paper investigates optimal emissions policies satisfying certain temperature constraints. The results show that only if we consider negative emissions coupled with drastic emissions reductions, temperature could be stabilized at about 2.5 °C, otherwise higher temperatures could possibly occur. To this end, two scenarios are developed based on the national emissions reduction plan of China and the USA. According to the simulation results, the objective of keeping temperature rise under 2 °C cannot be met. Clearly, negative emissions are needed if the Paris targets are to be given a chance for success. However, the feasibility of negative emissions mainly depends on technologies not yet developed. Reliance on future technological breakthroughs could very well prove unfounded and provide excuses for continued carbon releases with possible severe and irreversible climate repercussions. Thus, the Paris Agreement needs immediate amendments that will lead to stronger mitigation and adaptation commitments if it is to stay close to its goals.



Total Pages: 12
Pages: 319-330


Manuscript ViewPdf Subscription required to access this document

Obtain access this manuscript in one of the following ways

Already subscribed?

Need information on obtaining a subscription? Personal and institutional subscriptions are available.

Already an author? Have access via email address?


Volume: 24
Issue: 2
Year: 2018


Ackerman, F., & Bueno, R. (2011). Use of McKinsey abatement cost curvesfor climate economics modeling (Working Paper No. WP-US-1102).Stockholm Environment Institute. Retrieved from

Ackerman, F., Stanton, E.A., & Bueno, R. (2012). CRED v. 1.4 technicalreport. Stockholm Environment Institute. Retrieved from

Ackerman, Frank, Elizabeth A. Stanton, and Ramón Bueno. "CRED: A New Model of Climate and Development." Ecological Economics 85 (2013): 166-176. Crossref. Web.

Anderson, K., and G. Peters. "The Trouble with Negative Emissions." Science 354.6309 (2016): 182-183. Crossref. Web.

Ashcroft, M. (2013). Negative emissions technologies: Climate necessity ortechnical distraction? Carbon Trust News. Retrieved from

Benveniste, H., Criqui, P., Boucher, O., Breon, FM., Guivarch, C., Prados, Le Treut, H. (2015). The INDC counter, aggregation of nationalcontributions and 2 °C trajectories (Working Paper No. hal-01245354).HAL open archive. Retrieved from

Boucher, Olivier et al. "Opinion: In the Wake of Paris Agreement, Scientists Must Embrace New Directions for Climate Change Research." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113.27 (2016): 7287-7290. Crossref. Web.

Dimitrov, Radoslav S. "The Paris Agreement on Climate Change: Behind Closed Doors." Global Environmental Politics 16.3 (2016): 1-11. Crossref. Web.

Den Elzen, Michel et al. "Contribution of the G20 Economies to the Global Impact of the Paris Agreement Climate Proposals." Climatic Change 137.3-4 (2016): 655-665. Crossref. Web.

Fawcett, A. A. et al. "Can Paris Pledges Avert Severe Climate Change?" Science 350.6265 (2015): 1168-1169. Crossref. Web.

Fujimori, Shinichiro et al. "Implication of Paris Agreement in the Context of Long-Term Climate Mitigation Goals." SpringerPlus 5.1 (2016): n. pag. Crossref. Web.

Grigoroudis, Evangelos et al. "Optimal Abatement Policies and Related Behavioral Aspects of Climate Change." Environmental Development 19 (2016): 10-22. Crossref. Web.

Hof, A., van Soest, H., van den Berg, M., de Boer, H.S., den Elzen, M.,Harmsen, M., Roelfsema, M., & van Vuuren, D. (2015). Raising theambition level of INDCs allows for a smoother energy transition (ReportNo. 1928). PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.Retrieved from

Iyer, Gokul C et al. "The Contribution of Paris to Limit Global Warming to 2 °C." Environmental Research Letters 10.12 (2015): 125002. Crossref. Web.

Jeffery, L., Fyson, C., Alexander, R., Gütschow, J., Rocha, M., & Cantzler,J., Blok, K. (2015). 2. 7 °C is not enough, we can get lower. ClimateAction Tracker. Retrieved from

Kennel, C. F., S. Briggs, and D. G. Victor. "Making Climate Science More Relevant." Science 354.6311 (2016): 421-422. Crossref. Web.

Meinshausen, Malte et al. "National Post-2020 Greenhouse Gas Targets and Diversity-Aware Leadership." Nature Climate Change 5.12 (2015): 1098-1106. Crossref. Web.

Nordhaus, W.D., & Boyer, J. (2000). Warming the world: Economic modelsof global warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

Peters, Glen P et al. "Measuring a Fair and Ambitious Climate Agreement Using Cumulative Emissions." Environmental Research Letters 10.10 (2015): 105004. Crossref. Web.

Proto, Eugenio, and Aldo Rustichini. "A Reassessment of the Relationship Between GDP and Life Satisfaction." Ed. Mariano Sigman. PLoS ONE 8.11 (2013): e79358. Crossref. Web.

Rogelj, Joeri et al. "Paris Agreement Climate Proposals Need a Boost to Keep Warming Well Below 2 °C." Nature 534.7609 (2016): 631-639. Crossref. Web.

Schleussner, Carl-Friedrich et al. "Science and Policy Characteristics of the Paris Agreement Temperature Goal." Nature Climate Change 6.9 (2016): 827-835. Crossref. Web.

Stanton, E.A., Cegan, J., Bueno, R., & Ackerman, F. (2012). Estimating regions”relative vulnerability to climate damages in the CRED model (WorkingPaper No. WP-US-1103, revised). Stockholm Environment Institute.Retrieved from

Stavins, R.N. (2016). The Paris agreement lays a good foundation forclimate progress: An economic perspective. The Environmental Forum,33, 13. Retrieved from

Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.

UNFCCC. (2016). Decisions adopted by the Conference of the Parties:Decision 1/CP. 21. United Nations, Framework Convention on ClimateChange. Retrieved from


ISSN PRINT: 1079-8587
ISSN ONLINE: 2326-005X
DOI PREFIX: 10.31209
PREVIOUS DOI PREFIX (with T&F): 10.1080/10798587
InCites Journal IMPACT FACTOR (JIF) Data

2018  0.790
2017  0.652
2016  0.644

Scimago Journal and Country Rank (SJR) Data

2018  0.993
2017  0.655
2016  0.660
SJR: "The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric."

Journal: 1995-Present


TSI Press
18015 Bullis Hill
San Antonio, TX 78258 USA
PH: 210 479 1022
FAX: 210 479 1048